HAROLD
INNIS
Canadian
economist and pioneer historian of economics and communication, who
believed that the main thrust for societal change is determined by
development in communication forms. As new forms of communication
become dominant, the nature of society changes fundamentally to
accommodate these developments. Thus, e.g., the nature of oral
cultures changed dramatically with the development of writing.
Writing-based cultures structured their societies fundamentally
differently from their oral-based predecessors.
Innis was
fundamentally pessimistic about the change from a print to an
electronic culture, in contrast to his pupil, Marshall
McLuhan.
Innis
"imaginatively used the interface, or borderline situation, to present
a new world of economic and cultural change by studying the interplay
between man's artifacts and environments created by old and new
technologies. By investigating social effects as contours of changing
technology, Innis did what Plato and Aristotle failed to
do. He discovered from the alphabet onward, the great vortices of
power at the interface of cultural frontiers. He recovered for the
West the world of entelechies and formal causality long buried by the
logicians and teachers of applied knowledge; and he did this by
looking carefully at the immediate situation created by staples and
the action of the Canadian cultural borderline on which he was
located" (M. McLuhan and Bruce; R. Powers, 1989).
From
http://www.regent.edu/acad/schcom/rojc/mdic/innis3.html:
Empire & Communication/Bias of
Communication
(Innis's two most famous works, published
in the early 1950s)
Innis's idea is
that the dominant form of communication determines societal structues
(see also McLuhan and Walter Ong for more on this). Each
civilization that has developed across history takes its form from a
"bias" created by the preponderance of a type of communication. He
divides media according to two such biases: time-binding media and space-binding
media. Time-binding media such as manuscripts and oral
communication have limited distribution potential. According to Carey
(1992), time-binding media (primarily involving the roal tradition)
"favored relatively close communities, metaphysical speculation, and
traditional authority" (p. 134). Space-binding media such as print
and electronic media are concerned with expansion and control.
Thus, space-binding media "favored the establishment of commercialism,
empire and eventually technocracy" (Carey, p. 134).
Looking back
into history, change seems to comes about as a result of
media/technological development (a technological determinist
argument). For example, according to McQuail (1994), the
technological shift from stone to papyrus also shifted power in
societal structures away from royalty and towards the priesthood. To
take another example, in McQuail's words:
In
ancient Greece, an oral tradition and a flexible alphabet favored
inventiveness and diversity and prevented the emergenceof a
priesthood with a monopoly over education. The foundation and
endurance of the Roman empire was assisted was assisted by a culture
of writing and documents on which legal-bureaucratic institutions,
capable of administering distant provinces, could be based.
Printing, in its turn, challenged the bureaucratic monoploy of power
and encouraged both individualism and nationalism. (p.
85)
According to Innis, then, modern western history began with
temporal organization and ended with spatial organization.
Carey wrote, "It is the history of the evaporation of an oral and
manuscript tradition and the concerns of community, morals, and
metaphysics and their replacement by print and electronics supporting
a bias towards space" (p. 160).
See also:
~~~~~~~~~~
FREDRIC JAMESON
An American Marxist
who popularised postmodernism, which he says corresponds to a
phase of late capitalism. In many ways his work carries on from
the Frankfurt
School.
Central ideas of
Jameson:
i) Commodification
of culture.
ii) Increases in culture and cultural outlets;
formation of the culture industry.
iii) A breakdown in the
distinction between culture and the society that produces it. (E.g.,
Beatles had control of their music, but today Madonna is just an
economic entity.)
Jameson sees postmodernity
in negative terms; for example, postmodern architecture is a
product of "invisible" capitalism and continuing need for
commodification.
The penetration
of the culture
industry, first noted by Frankfurt
School academics in the 1920s, has intensified. Since the 1970s,
things that were practical parts of everyday life and not normally
part of "culture" now are cultural products to be commodified
(e.g., town planning, international cuisine, etc.). This diversifies
capitalism by turning social activities into economic ones. (This is
Jameson's conception of "late capitalism").
Jameson says
that loss of meaning in postmodern style means we lose our way,
don't know where we are and then become lost on capitalism the same
way as we would get lost in a shopping mall. Late capitalism
manufactures new commodities like Madonna and Spinal
Tap because of the fall of Fordism
and the drift toward globalization
and global capitalism. Jameson argues that commodification
replaces other areas of life like politics and art. In terms of identity,
the subject in a postmodern world is not alienated, but rather
fragmented. "Alientation presumes a central, unitary self . . . [b]ut
if, as a postmodernist sees it, the self is decentered and multiple,
the cocept of alienation breaks down. All that is left is the anxiety
of identity" (Turkle, 1995: 49).
~~~~~~~~~~
CHARLES
JENCKS
Postmodern
booster, 1982 author of The Language of Post-Modern
Architecture, in which he argues that the attempts of
postmodernism's detractors to announce the death of the style was
premature. In fact, postmodern architecture has triumphed around the
world, he argues, and the desire of some to see it off is only
evidence of its success. Broadly, Jencks remains quite positive
about postmodernism; the opening up of new narrative styles leads to
more effective ways of looking at social issues than boring old
naturalism.