Panopticon's Author Index Mm

| home | index | core | topics | quiz | beyond
<< PREVIOUS | NEXT >>

Mm Kazimar Malevich
Karl Marx
Marshall McLuhan
John Milton


KAZIMAR MALEVICH

One of the Suprematists, a primarily Russian early 20th century art movement which politicized ways of making art. The Suprematists dealt with ideal mathematical, industrial forms, exploring the ideal basic elements that go into making images (supreme elements i.e., "Suprematism"):
- from this springs modular design in books, posters, and architecture.
- ornamentation was extra, not needed.

Malevich took abstraction to the highest extreme with his Black Square, literally a black square on a white background.

Malevich in Russia (after the Revolution):
1) abstraction prominent.
2) Malevich sees beginnings of Construcivism.
3) Constructivism - "Machine age" art, 3-D in nature, uses materials and methods of industry (steel, plastics, etc.)

~~~~~~~~~~

KARL MARX

With Friedrich Engels (see Das Kapital), Marx concentrated on political economy and economic relations between classes of people.
Marx developed Hegel's dialectic, (thesis/antithesis/ synthesis, a.k.a. base-superstructure) theories to set the economic framework as the base, with the (hegemonic-style) culture of the ruling classes as the superstructure. This famous Hegelian dialectic was a Socratic-influenced principle that every idea contains internal contradictions (the thesis and antithesis) that must struggle to create a new idea (or synthesis). Marx most often emphasized such Hegelian, classical, and German humanist motifs and concerns. However, he rejected the focus on Hegel's abstract Idea and turned instead to dialectical materialism, based on now-familiar notions of historical and economic determinism. Marx's theory held that the overthrow of the oppressors in this system was inevitable.

Marx's base-superstructure theory (economic base provided for cultural superstructure) was in turn later elaborated by subsequrent theorists such as Antonio Gramsci (originator of hegemony theory).

He was also a powerful influence on the Frankfurt school; in fact, Òthe pioneering efforts in the 1930s of Benjamin and Adorno and also of Brecht to develop a dialectical relation between cultural consumption and production had been suggested by MarxÓ (Lunn, Marxism and Modernism, p. 12).

"Under capitalist conditions, according to Marx, art has become, to an important degree, a form of alienated labor through its near reduction to commodity status in the marketplace" (Lunn, p. 15). Thus the romantic mystification of art has been replaced by commodity fetishism (later developed by Lukacs into the concept of reification).

Marx and John Stuart Mill
Mill and Marx are regarded as the great ideological rivals of the mid-19th century. Mill, the great individualist, nevertheless believed in society as much as Marx, but he conceived of it somewhat differently. Mill's construction for society was pluralistic, composed of many parts, while Marx's view of societal organization was more holistic, conceived of as an integrated whole. Both, in their own ways, contributed to the intellectual environment that spawned 20th-century socialism, social democracy, and social responsibility; but Marx's insistence that nothing short of revolution could overcome the forces of capitalism places him further from the heart of modern social democracy, which emphasizes evolutionary development and change within, broadly speaking, the status quo.

~~~~~~~~~~

MARSHALL McLUHAN

Canadian scholar and media critic who studied under Harold Innis. McLuhan believed that the main thrust for societal change in human society was development in communication forms. As new forms of communication became dominant, society changed to accommodate these developments. Thus the nature of cultures changed dramatically with the development of writing.

The Medium is the Message. McLuhan was very optimistic about the change from a print to an electronic culture; hence his famous dictum, "The Medium is the Message," which suggests that the nature of the communications medium has a direct impact on how society and its members think and operate, outlines why. Television, for example, does not simply present a picture of the world to its audiences -- it fundamentally alters the way people think about the world. Its role in determining what audiences see and how they make sense of what they see is central.

The Global Village. McLuhan also famously pronounced in the 1960s that the world had become a "global village" - thus drawing attention to the developing trend of globalization. Why did he say this? Well, he posited that communications media and technology had become in effect an extension of our bodies and our senses. This is pretty significant. Just as a prosthesis is a mechanical extension of a body, so the communication network is an extension of the nervous system. Now that the electronic communication has spread around the world, so has our neural network. "Television has become our eyes, the telephone our mouths and ears; our brains are the interchange for a nervous system that stretches across the whole world" (Woolley, 125).

In recent years McLuhan has been heavily criticized and castigated by many in the field, particularly for his later writings, which are regarded by many as "off the wall." He and Innis both have been damned by many as simple technological determinists (or at any rate, media determinists). However, there is also much in their work that was a valid continuation of the work of the Frankfurt School. Further, there was much that was prescient in McLuhan's earlier work, and which still remains relevant, especially to students of critical theory, global communications, and the developing role of the Internet.

See also:

~~~~~~~~~~

JOHN MILTON

Milton's contribution to the American belief system is fundamental not only because of his optimism, but also for his belief in rational, open debate, summed up most eloquently in his masterpiece, Areopagitica. This work, first printed in 1644 and heavily quoted and lauded by revolutionary-inclined Americans over a century later, remains one of the greatest essays in defense of reason, rationality, and open-mindedness in the the English language.

Taken in tandem with his epic poem, Paradise Lost, its effect on the American polity has been incalculable. Even though Milton himself could never overcome his personal prejudices against Roman Catholics, his words retain powerful resonances among all those who reject censorship in favor of an "open marketplace of ideas," a phrase never used by Milton (it was coined by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Olover Wendell Holmes) but later indelibly linked to his ideas.

Milton's Areopagitica was presented to the English Parliament, which was at the time under the control of Cromwell's forces during the time of the English Civil War -- a time when lots of ideas were being challenged. He gave the following reasons in support of his argument for a repeal of restrictive English licensing laws:

a.) It was necessary to permit freedom of expression, which is of benefit to society.
b.) It was necessary to help printers make more money to support themselves.

Milton thus provided a philospohical foundation that has supported and been supported by journalists since before the founding of the Republic: the search for truth and virtue. According to Milton, the truth would always emerge triumphant under what became known as "the self-righting principle." If there is one single philosophical justification anywhere for free and open expression, this is it.


CT. Author Index Mm

BACK TO TOP

  | home | index | core | topics | quiz | beyond

<< PREVIOUS | NEXT >>

© Contents are copyright by Douglas Bicket, unless stated otherwise. These may be reproduced for non-commercial, educational purposes provided this notice is included and contents are not altered.

Last Updated: feb. 26, 2001