FERDINAND TOENNIES
German 19th
century sociologist: Compared Gemeinschaft, a
pre-industrial, rural village communities -- where everyone else knew
each other intimately ... … with Gesellschaft, an urban,
mechanical society in which people only knew each other in
non-personal, professional terms. Such a view, it is argues, makes the
individual easy prey for authoritarian
impulses.
~~~~~~~~~~
SHERRY TURKLE
Popularist of postmodern/postsructuralist thought and the
Internet (and, shamefully, one of only a few women to make it into
this author index so far -- that will change, I hope).
Turkle's work
centers on psychological and sociological changes underway in people
as a result of the new computer and communications age -- something
that lies close to the heart of what this Web Site is supposed to be
about. In books such as her Life on the Screen, she posits that
as a result of this interaction, our very conception of how the world
works is altering quite radically.
She takes the
example of the PC vs. Mac debate to describe the shift from modern to
postmodern values, i.e., DOS-based PCs, or UNIX, supports "a modernist
interpretation of understanding, according to which understanding
proceeds by reducing complex things to simpler elements." However,
unlike DOS or the PC, Macinoshes "encouraged users to stay at a
surface level of visual representation and gave no hint of inner
mechanisms" (Turkle, p. 34).
In many ways the
experience of working on a PC is very different from that of a Mac.
The simulated desktop environment of the Mac points "to a new kind of
experience in which people do not so much command machines as enter
into conversations with them" (Turkle, p. 35). Although of course the
Mac works the same way as other computers, its workings are kept well
hidden, and "the tools of the modernist culture of calculation became
layered underneath the expereience of the [postmodern] culture of
simulation." (More to come)
Furthermore,
Turkle, in many ways echoing Jean
Baudrillard, talks about television as part of the postmodern
"culture of simulation," where we learn to identify with the simulated
world of television
more readily than we do with the "real" world around us. For example:
The
bar featured in the television series Cheers no doubt
figures so prominently in the American imagination at least partly
because most of us don't have a neighborhood place where "everybody
knows your name." Instead, we identify with the place on the screen,
and most recently have given it some life off the screen as well.
Bars designed to look like the obe on Cheers have sprung up
all over the country, most poignantly in airports, our most
anonymous of locales. Here, noone will know your name, but you can
always buy a drink or a souvenir sweatshirt (Turkle, 235).
Turkle posits
that it may be televsion's predisposition toward simulation that has
laid the groundwork for the next development in our relationship with
reality and simulation, respectively. Computers and the virtual worlds
they now provide are perhaps adding another level (or dimension) of
mediated experience to our increasing susceptibilty to simulation.
"Perhaps computers and virtuality in its various forms feels so
natural to us because of their similarity to watching TV, our dominant
media experience for the past forty years" (Turkle, 235).
See also:
~~~~~~~~~~
ALAN TURING
Turing,
a British wartime and postwar scientist, was a genius (and I'm not
being flip in saying this) who first conceptualized computers as
"universal machines" in the 1930s, applied his knowledge to
mechanically breaking German wartime codes in the 1940s, and finally
pursued the concept -- years ahead of his time -- of
computer-originated artificial intelligence.
"Every computer
is virtual, each one a shadow of one machine, a machine specified,
though not built, in 1936 by the British mathematician Alan Turing in
a paper entitled 'On computable numbers'" (Woolley, p. 60). The
original Turing Machine was a logical mathemetical machine. His idea
of a machine that could simulate the behavior of the human brain had
very profound significance.
"The discovery
that there could be a computer that could compute any computable
number does not sound like the most shattering intellectual advance.
But that is because we have got used to the idea of the computer. In
1936, it meant a person. Following Turing's insight, it meant a
machine: he had proved, in other words, that it was possible to
mechanize what had previously only been possible by means of mental
effort. The machine had crossed a critical barrier. Before, machines
had taken over the body, now they threatened to take over the mind"
(Woolley, p. 67).
(MORE TO COME).
Click below to see a Quicktime movie clip about
Turing's thoughts: |
|
(NB: Movie clip file size is 8MB; it
may take several minutes to download on slower machines
and/or modems.) |
CT.
Author Index
Tt