Kiss of the Panopticon -- subject index

Panopticon's Subject Index Ff

| home | index | core | topics | quiz | beyond
<<PREVIOUS | NEXT >>

 

 

 






Ff
Feminist Theory
Fordism
Framing/Frame Analysis
Frankfurt School
French Thinkers, 20th Century


FEMINIST THEORY

One of the tasks of Feminist Theory is to deconstruct common written and visual texts in society to show the underlying sexist assumptions upon which they are based. For example, if a society encourages male domination over women as a general rule, its discourses will often reflect operating ideology/ies that will tend to be heavily male-oriented and show women in a passive or negative light, e.g., as mothers, sexual temptresses, fools, bad drivers (a favorite up till the 1980s), or delicate creatures that must be protected by the dominating male.

NB: Feminist theory should not really be set off as a separate entry, since its importance in so many areas of critical and cultural theory is central. As with class and race, the feminist perspective is an integral component in the broader drive to understand culture, technology, and the human condition in the so-called post-modern age. Expect to see much more on this site concerning related subjects such as cyborgs and the body (see Donna Haraway, identity, the self, and post-colonialism.

One of the areas where the feminist critique has been most thorough has been in debunking the classical (or Enlightenment) belief in scientific rationality and objectivity. For many feminists, the history of science is fraught with patriarchal ideological assumptions put forth in the guise of dispassionate truth. Not only have women's bodies been the terrain of scientific scrutiny, but scientific language has often relied on gendered metaphors that give patriarchal ideas about gender difference the aura of absolute truth.

Philosopher Sandra Harding, for example, holds that science is totally wrapped up in networks of ideologies that uphold "patriarchal institutions." That is not to say simply that science is sexist, but that the whole endeavors wrapped up in the broader male discourse, which as a whole puts women in a subordinate position.

According to Claudia Springer, "Among the most carefully researched analyses of how scientific knowledge has complemented both patriarchal and racist ideologies is Donna Haraway's history of primatology, Primate Visions. Traditional primate studies, she shows, have revolved around the binary terms nature/culture and sex/gender and under the guise of objective science have expressed value judgments used to explain human as well as animal behavior. Thus, primatology has been used to justify cultural constructions of gender by attempting to locate their origins in nature and in biological sex" (Springer, 1996, pp. 47-48). Springer concludes: "The feminist analysis of scientific discourses is one aspect of a much larger cultural crisis over gender and sexuality. Late twentieth-century Western culture is divided more than ever before between those who reject and those who cling to the patriarchal assumption of male superiority."

See also:

~~~~~~~~~~

FORDISM

Fordism, a stage in the development of 20th century capitalism marked by intense relationships between governments, unions, international capital; this type of economics still under state control. WWII gave a boost to industries that required mass production (chemicals, steel, etc.), and Fordism's heyday was between 1945 and 1973. Characteristics:

    1) 8-hour day, 5-day week.
    2) Ford didn't invent mass consumption but he realised mass consumption meant new forms of labour management and modern psychology
    3) Gramsci believed basically the same thing.
    4) The dominant view of Fordism is positive: increases in education, health care provision, more leisure time, increased wealth of workers, continued the Enlightenment project (see Habermas), rational and beneficial.
    BUT some negative views -- standardisation, dullness, excluded certain groups (3rd World, racial minorities, women).
    5) From 1950s-1960s: period of optimism, Western economies "going at full steam," but inflation was rising. Crunch came in 1973 -- oil crisis, world bank faillures, capitalism began to be perceived as too rigid.

~~~~~~~~~~

FRAMING/FRAME ANALYSIS

This refers to the placement of language and culture within a framework of power, of systems of politics and economics. This method presents individuals "as simultaneous makers and consumers of culture, participating in that culture according to their place in economic and political structures." (Boylan, MA, 1992).

This area emphasizes the role of institutions -- governments, churches, media -- in making culture." Writers in this area include Raymond Williams, Michel Foucault, Gaye Tuchman, Todd Gitlin and Stuart Hall. Hall in particular developed a theory of text which allowed for a measure of "negotiated" or "oppositional" readings of the text by the audience. In particular he proposed a model of encoding-decoding of media discourses. In this the meaning of the text, which is located somewhere between its producer and the reader, is framed (or encoded) by the producer in a certain way, and the reader decodes the text's message slightly differently, according to his/her personal background, and the various different social situations and frames of interpretation. (McQuail, Denis. Mass Communication Theory: an introduction.).

Frames of meaning/frame analysis: based on Marx's base-superstructure theory (economic base provided for cultural superstructure), elaborated by subsequent theorists, e.g., Antonio Gramsci and hegemony.

~~~~~~~~~~
 

FRANKFURT SCHOOL

~k.i.s.s.~
The Frankfurt School, officially known as the Institute for Social Research at the University of Frankfurt, was basically a German Marxist critique of capitalism in ideological terms (as opposed to economic terms) with some Freudianism thrown in for good measure.

Apart from anything else, the Frankurt School provides a theoretical bridge between traditional Marxist scholarship and cultural orientation of, e.g., the Birmingham School of British Cultural Studies.

I. Origins of Frankfurt School

1.) Started out as a post-WW I (formed in 1923), Marxist-based reaction to the crises of war, revolution, and upheaval in Europe. Although Marxist based, it was also critical of orthodox Marxism.

2.) Set up in 1923 by Felix Weil as an interdisciplinary institutional center for research into political economy (in German Weimar republic) for research into political economy and cultural production.

3.) Based on a critique of then-standard Marxist doctrine: Lukacs, for example, (a central figure of the Frankfurt School) was against what he called deterministic Marxism. He said you had to activate the proletariat first before you can have action. This reflected the deep contemporary splits in the communist/socialist parties of Russia and Europe.

4.) From 1931, the school was under Max Horkheimer and moved its focus to philosophy, culture, and the media (this became the main focus for European intellectuals from the 1930s to 1940s).

5.) In the 1930s, the most of the Institute's members fled Germany and moved to the United States, where they continued their research (becoming a major center for exiled European intellectuals in the 1930s and 1940s).

This is probably important >> Most of the Institute's scholars had had experience of a mass society turning to Hitler and Nazism, under the influence of media and propaganda, and had to flee from that oppressive environment. (Some, like Walter Benjamin, didn't make it out in time!) This collective experience undoubtedly chad some impact, coloring their opinions and ideas about the very nature of society.

II. Ideas

1.) The Frankfurt School's position broadly was that people are easily fooled by capitalism ("false consciousness") and the culture industry: An analysis of Freud's work can be one way of understanding why. (Mass psychology of Marxism.)

2.) Frankfurt School idea of "reality" was that of bourgeois society controlling almost everything under capitalism -- culture is processed through "culture industry" (see over). It criticized Enlightenment ideas of progressive culture, harmony, authenticity, and culture encompassing the best creative efforts of people who are authentically free.

3.) Ideology not a function of authentic individual beliefs, instead characterized as distortions of reality whose purpose is to camouflage and legitimate unequal power relations.

4.) While mostly negative, most Frankfurt School scholars did recognize (as did Gramsci) that an authentic "culture"/cultures could exist outside of the capitalist elites -- it was just very difficult for this culture to sustain itself or communicate (see Culture industries).

CULTURE INDUSTRIES

This includes, in media terms all mass media (in 1920s, 1930s, newspapers, magazines, the movies, radio) plus most other means of cultural production (theater, opera, artistic exhibitions, etc.). Applied to the present day, it could of course cover all the other mass media in society, such as television and the Web. (See also under subject index C)

1.) All these forces of media/cultural production are intertwined: a system.

2.) Culture industry is intricately linked with the present-day dominant models of the economy/culture; e.g. capitalist production, distribution, exchange, consumption. So culture is produced in just the same way as, say, automobiles or refrigerators.

3.) Media serve only to maintain culture industry (as below).

production >>>>>>(artistic) composition

 

distribution >>>>>>reproduction

 
Exchange >>>>>>>culture creation

 
consumption >>>>>reception  

(Note: Think about the role of the individual author in all this. Is the author the creator of a unique individual work -- the Classical liberal/Romantic idea -- or is s/he simply reproducing the ideas and values of a system over which s/he has no control?

4.) The masses are thus systematically manipulated and progressively unable to criticize their society effectively; they may have some authentic types of cultural expression, but the mass media/cultural industries prevent culture from being effectively communicated in any authentic form -- unless it has first been commodified and changed to fit the capitalist system.

5.) The culture industry thus commodifies and standardizes art (music, fashion, etc.) then fools people into thinking it's "original" in order to sell it.

6.) The only people left who can still meaningfully critique Enlightenment ideas, capitalism and the culture industry are the avant-gardes (i.e., the artistic elites -- could be anything from James Joyce to rap music).

7.) But even "authentic" culture (as defined by bourgeoisie) has difficulty surviving against capitalism; avant garde expression tends to quickly get swallowed up by society and become commodified itself.

~ Food for thought? ~

Think about how you can apply the ideas of the Frankfurt School scholars to more recent articulations of cultural expression, such as rock 'n' roll, punk, or rap/hip-hop music, or the Hippie movement in the 1960s. Are these examples of "avant-garde" or "authentic" cultural production that have simply been gobbled up by consumer society and "commodified"? What other examples can you think of?

Frankfurt School prominent members included:

    Major Influences:
    1) Hegel - saw history as the history of human ideas.
    2) Marx - concentrated on political economy (Lukacs drew Hegel's and Marx's ideas together).
    3) Weber - said that world had lost its magic and enchantment because of industrialization.

     

    ~~~~~~~~~~

    FRENCH THINKERS, 20th CENTURY

    ***Click on the names below to find out more about
    these famous Frenchmen!***

    Roland Barthes
    French philosopher of the left.

    Jean Baudrillard
    If you accept Baudrillard's extreme position on poststructuralism and postmodernism, you are left with the conclusion that there is no absolute truth; only different versions of things.

    Albert Camus
    Algerian-born French Existentialist author, thinker.

    Jacques Derrida
    "The language deconstructionist." Derrida, a prominent deconstructionist (1930 - ), studied the nature of language, knowledge and meaning. He concentrated on deconstructing language and Western philosophy. When language tries to deal with society as a whole, signifiers slide into other signifiers without reaching a signified; only reach meaning when working on a small level.

    Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari
    Postmodernism's most famous double act.

    Michel Foucault
    "The prison/systems deconstructionist." Foucault (1926-1984) used the metaphor of the prison to examine the nature of power in history. Foucault was primarily concerned with the history of systems of social thought. Foucault takes apart/deconstructs systems (eg. psychology and sociology) and asks how these disciplines have imposed theirown needs on how we look at the world; he said it's better to look at the little bits than the big picture (look at one prison instead of society as a whole).

    Jacques Lacan
    "The toughie." Lacan (French poststructuralist; very difficult to understand). Lacan's theory decenters the self; says self is constructed in language. Lacan decenters the source of knowledge and assumptions of Western thought by destabilizing self.

    Claude Levi-Strauss
    French linguist and structuralist.

    Jean-Paul Sartre
    Existentialist thinker.


    CT. Subject Index Ff

    | HOME | INDEX | CORE | TOPICS | QUIZ |
    <-- PREVIOUS ~ NEXT -->

    © Contents are copyright by Douglas Bicket, unless stated otherwise. These may be reproduced for non-commercial, educational purposes provided this notice is included and contents are not altered.

    Last Updated: Feb. 20, 2001